Overcrowding and capacity in factor-based investing

Many investors combine concerns over overcrowding in factors with capacity fears. We want to help separate these terms and provide some clarity over the current state of factors.

On the basis of valuations, more risk-averse investors may believe that factors are overcrowded. We believe though that there are a few more spare tables at this café. The problem of capacity is more acute for investors’ returns. However, if investors were to allow their index fund manager more leeway in tracking error or employ a manager who can estimate and manage the costs more effectively, the capacity threshold could be raised.
overcrowding.jpg

The difference between the following definitions is nuanced but critical. Capacity tends to be more rooted in fact, whereas overcrowding is subjective. As such, the general trend is to talk of overcrowding of a market, or factors on the whole, and capacity of a fund or specific strategy.

If you’ve ever turned away from a café thinking “I can’t believe people are standing in that queue” and then gasped as six more people jump to the back, you can now consider yourself a witness to the results of inconsistent expectations.

No one would argue that the rationale for you turning away, or that of the six additional queuers, is wrong. They are simply different results driven by individual preferences or feelings of hunger, patience, or perhaps the draw of this particular establishment.

An example of this overcrowding/capacity dichotomy was in 2016, when many claimed that the low volatility factor was overcrowded and due for a crash. Some took to heart the many articles on this subject and others dismissed them as an attempt to derail the progress of the rules-based factor index products.

Table 1 below shows statistics of a few low volatility strategies relative to a market cap-weighted parent. The factor, and strategies attempting to gain exposure to it, has performed as intended. However, this does not mean that those warning of low volatility overcrowding were incorrect; rather their personal preference, based on risk tolerance, was such that they would not recommend further investment for like-minded individuals.

Download the full article

Investment capabilities

We incorporate our thinking across our range of index solutions

Author(s)

Dave Barron

Dave Barron

Head of Index Equity & Smart Beta

Contact us

This website is for professional / institutional investors only.

The content in this website is for information purposes only and we are not soliciting any action based on it. The information in this website is not an offer or recommendation to buy or sell securities or pursue a particular investment strategy and it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. L&G accepts no responsibility for the content of any email communication or a website to which a hypertext link from this site exists. The links are provided 'as is' with no warranty, express or implied.

The term “L&G” or “we” refers to L&G - Asset Management Limited and its subsidiaries. Legal & General Investment Management Asia Limited and LGIM Singapore Pte. Ltd are subsidiaries of L&G - Asset Management Limited.

Hong Kong: Issued by Legal & General Investment Management Asia Limited (BBB488), which is regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. The information contained in this website has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Singapore: Issued by LGIM Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Company Registration No. 202231876W) which is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. The information contained in this website has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.